State v. Jones
100 N.E.3d 445, 2018 Ohio 2418, 153 Ohio St. 3d 1428
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in State v. Jones. Read the opinion of the Court — 2018 Ohio 3637 →
Opinion
On review of an order certifying a conflict. The court determines that a conflict exists. The parties are ordered to brief the issue stated at page 1 of the court of appeals' entry filed April 3, 2018: "Must a dog have been previously designated as a 'dangerous dog' under Chapter 955 of the Ohio Revised Code before its owner may be prosecuted for a violation of R.C. 955.22 ?"
The conflict case is State v. Crocker, 5th Dist. Coshocton No. 2012 CA 0021,
Fischer, J., not participating.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
State v. Jones, 100 N.E.3d 445, 2018 Ohio 2418, 153 Ohio St. 3d 1428 (Ohio 2018).
100 N.E.3d 445 (State v. Jones) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
State v. Crocker
2013 Ohio 3100 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 2013)