State v. Jones

711 N.E.2d 232, 86 Ohio St. 3d 1404, 1999 Ohio LEXIS 1821
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in State v. Jones. Read the opinion of the Court — 78 Ohio St. 3d 12
Ohio Supreme Court·Decided June 16, 1999·No. 99-769·Published

Opinion

Montgomery App. No. 17382. On review of order certifying a conflict. The court determines that a conflict exists; the parties are to brief the issue stated at page 2 of the court of appeals’ Judgment Entry filed March 23,1999:

“Does an arrest in violation of R.C. 2935.26 constitute an unreasonable seizure under the Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution and Article I, Section 14 of the Ohio Constitution, thereby requiring suppression of evidence seized as a consequence of the violation of that statute?”

Resnick, J., not participating.

Sua sponte, this cause is consolidated with 99-613, infra.

Resnick, J., not participating.

The conflict cases are State v. Holmes (1985), 28 Ohio App.3d 12, 28 OBR 21, 501 N.E.2d 629; State v. Heideman (June 23, 1988), Ross App. No. 1429, unreported, 1988 WL 69122; and State v. Wilkinson (Sept. 30, 1986), Huron App. No. H-85-27, unreported, 1986 WL 11411.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Jones, 711 N.E.2d 232, 86 Ohio St. 3d 1404, 1999 Ohio LEXIS 1821 (Ohio 1999).

711 N.E.2d 232 (State v. Jones) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Holmes
501 N.E.2d 629 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 1985)