State v. Jones
This text of 135 A. 925 (State v. Jones) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The plaintiff in error was convicted in the Morris County Quarter Sessions on an indictment which charged, in substance, that on the 10th day of February, 1924, and from thence hitherto, he willfully and unlawfully kept on his premises at the township of Mount Olive, in the county of Morris, certain slot machines, nsed for the purpose of playing for money, &e., contrary to the form of the statute, &c.
The case is radically imperfect. The state of the case shows that a writ of error was sued out and a return made thereto. Nothing further seems to have been done. No errors have been assigned.
The appeal is dismissed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
135 A. 925, 5 N.J. Misc. 231, 1927 N.J. Sup. Ct. LEXIS 307, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-jones-nj-1927.