State v. Jones
177 S.E.2d 727, 10 N.C. App. 184, 1970 N.C. App. LEXIS 1230
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in State v. Jones. Read the opinion of the Court — 7 N.C. App. 166 →
Opinion
The defendant asserts that the punishment was cruel and excessive. There is no merit in this exception. State v. Caldwell, 269 N.C. 521, 153 S.E. 2d 34 (1967). We have reviewed the record and agree with the candid statement of counsel for the defendant that no error appears in the record.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
State v. Jones, 177 S.E.2d 727, 10 N.C. App. 184, 1970 N.C. App. LEXIS 1230 (N.C. Ct. App. 1970).
177 S.E.2d 727 (State v. Jones) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
State v. Caldwell
153 S.E.2d 34 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1967)