State v. Jones

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Jones

440 S.W.3d 591, 2014 Mo. App. LEXIS 986, 2014 WL 4412015

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided September 9, 2014·No. No. ED 99918·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Defendant Maurice Jones appeals his conviction by jury in the Circuit Court of the City of St. Louis of one count of Burglary in the First Degree, section 569.160, R.S.Mo. (2000), one count of Kidnapping, section 565.110, R.S.Mo. (Cum.Supp.2007), one count of Domestic Assault in the Second Degree, section 565.074, R.S.Mo. (Cum.Supp.2007), and one count of Domestic Assault in the Third Degree, section 565.073, R.S.Mo. (Cum.Supp.2007). We affirm the trial court’s judgment.

No error of law appears. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Defendant Maurice Jones appeals his conviction by jury in the Circuit Court of the City of St. Louis of one count of Burglary in the First Degree, section 569.160, R.S.Mo. (2000), one count of Kidnapping, section 565.110, R.S.Mo. (Cum.Supp.2007), one count of Domestic Assault in the Second Degree, section 565.074, R.S.Mo. (Cum.Supp.2007), and one count of Domestic Assault in the Third Degree, section 565.073, R.S.Mo. (Cum.Supp.2007). We affirm the trial court’s judgment.

No error of law appears. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

State v. Jones, 440 S.W.3d 591, 2014 Mo. App. LEXIS 986, 2014 WL 4412015 (Mo. Ct. App. 2014).

Pincite

440 S.W.3d 591 (State v. Jones) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related