State v. Jones

901 S.W.2d 353, 1995 Mo. App. LEXIS 1252
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in State v. Jones. Read the opinion of the Court — 1993 Mo. App. LEXIS 1256
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided June 30, 1995·No. Nos. 62776, 66878·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Defendant appeals his conviction by a jury for burglary in the second degree, § 569.170, RSMo 1994. He was sentenced by the court as a prior, persistent and class X offender to a ten year prison term. Defendant also appeals from the denial, after an evidentiary hearing, of his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief. We affirm.

We have reviewed the record and find the claims of error are without merit; the judgment of the motion court was not clearly erroneous. An opinion would have no prece-dential value nor serve any jurisprudential purpose. The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rules 30.25(b) and 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Jones, 901 S.W.2d 353, 1995 Mo. App. LEXIS 1252 (Mo. Ct. App. 1995).

901 S.W.2d 353 (State v. Jones) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.