State v. Jones

676 S.W.2d 60, 1984 Mo. App. LEXIS 4729
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in State v. Jones. Read the opinion of the Court — 1981 Mo. App. LEXIS 3588
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided August 8, 1984·No. No. 47620·Published

Opinion

[61]*61ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Defendant was jury convicted of robbery in the second degree, a violation of § 569.-030 RSMo 1978 and found to be a prior offender. He was sentenced to a term of fifteen years imprisonment.

The sole issue on appeal is the failure of the trial court to give defendant’s tendered instruction on identification testimony. That contention has been fully discussed and rejected in State v. Higgins, 592 S.W.2d 151, 161 (Mo. banc 1979); State v. Bevly, 665 S.W.2d 46, 51 (Mo.App.1984). An opinion reciting the facts and restating the law would have no precedential value. The judgment is affirmed in accordance with Rule 30.25(b).

All Judges concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Jones, 676 S.W.2d 60, 1984 Mo. App. LEXIS 4729 (Mo. Ct. App. 1984).

676 S.W.2d 60 (State v. Jones) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Higgins
592 S.W.2d 151 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1979)
State v. Bevly
665 S.W.2d 46 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1984)