State v. Jones

Supreme Court of Missouri

State v. Jones

27 S.W. 1102, 124 Mo. 479, 1894 Mo. LEXIS 306

Supreme Court of Missouri·Decided November 5, 1894·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Sherwood, J.

As the conviction of the defendant of an assault with intent to kill was, in all respects, regular, and the precedent steps leading to that result were of like validity, it only remains to say that the [480] judgment must be.affirmed because the bill of exceptions, so-called, was filed in-vacation, and no order was entered of record at the preceding term permitting this to be done.

All concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Sherwood, J.

As the conviction of the defendant of an assault with intent to kill was, in all respects, regular, and the precedent steps leading to that result were of like validity, it only remains to say that the [480] judgment must be.affirmed because the bill of exceptions, so-called, was filed in-vacation, and no order was entered of record at the preceding term permitting this to be done.

All concur.

State v. Jones, 27 S.W. 1102, 124 Mo. 479, 1894 Mo. LEXIS 306 (Mo. 1894).

Pincite

27 S.W. 1102 (State v. Jones) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related