State v. Jones

76 So. 3d 1278, 11 La.App. 3 Cir. 400, 2011 La. App. LEXIS 1260, 2011 WL 5191756
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in State v. Jones. Read the opinion of the Court — 999 So. 2d 1156
Louisiana Court of Appeal·Decided November 2, 2011·No. 11-400·Published

Opinion

PAINTER, Judge.

hFor the reasons set forth in the companion case hereto, State v. Jones, 11-399 (La.App. 3 Cir. 11/2/11), 76 So.3d 1274, Defendant’s convictions are affirmed. However, because Defendant’s habitual offender sentence is indeterminate, the habitual offender sentence is vacated and remanded to the trial court for resentenc-ing. The trial court is directed to clarify which count or counts it is enhancing and to impose separate sentences for each conviction.

Additionally, the trial court is directed to advise the Defendant of the prescriptive period for filing post-conviction relief as required by La.Code Crim.P. art. 930.8.

AFFIRMED; HABITUAL OFFENDER SENTENCE VACATED; AND REMANDED WITH INSTRUCTIONS.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Jones, 76 So. 3d 1278, 11 La.App. 3 Cir. 400, 2011 La. App. LEXIS 1260, 2011 WL 5191756 (La. Ct. App. 2011).

76 So. 3d 1278 (State v. Jones) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Jones
76 So. 3d 1274 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 2011)