State v. Jones

Supreme Court of Louisiana

State v. Jones

946 So. 2d 173, 2007 La. LEXIS 5, 2007 WL 79519

CourtSupreme Court of Louisiana

DecidedJanuary 12, 2007

DocketNo. 2006-K-1635

StatusPublished

This text of 946 So. 2d 173 (State v. Jones) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Jones, 946 So. 2d 173, 2007 La. LEXIS 5, 2007 WL 79519 (La. 2007).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Writ granted; probation revocation reinstated. The district court made a supported finding that by committing the misdemeanor offense of accessory after the fact to unauthorized use of a credit card, relator had violated the mandatory term of probation requiring him to “refrain from criminal conduct.” La.C.Cr.P. art. 895(A). That finding justified the court’s exercise of its discretion to revoke probation under La.C.Cr.P. art. 900(A)(5) as a sanction when the court determines that “the defendant has violated ... a condition of probation,” La.C.Cr.P. art. 900(A), without the need for a misdemeanor conviction under La.C.Cr.P. art. 901(A). State v. Dorest, 01-0581 (La.1/10/02), 805 So.2d 132.

JOHNSON, J., would grant and docket.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Writ granted; probation revocation reinstated. The district court made a supported finding that by committing the misdemeanor offense of accessory after the fact to unauthorized use of a credit card, relator had violated the mandatory term of probation requiring him to “refrain from criminal conduct.” La.C.Cr.P. art. 895(A). That finding justified the court’s exercise of its discretion to revoke probation under La.C.Cr.P. art. 900(A)(5) as a sanction when the court determines that “the defendant has violated ... a condition of probation,” La.C.Cr.P. art. 900(A), without the need for a misdemeanor conviction under La.C.Cr.P. art. 901(A). State v. Dorest, 01-0581 (La.1/10/02), 805 So.2d 132.

JOHNSON, J., would grant and docket.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

946 So. 2d 173, 2007 La. LEXIS 5, 2007 WL 79519, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-jones-la-2007.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack