State v. Jones

District Court of Appeal of Florida

State v. Jones

613 So. 2d 577, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 1518, 1993 WL 30644

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedFebruary 8, 1993

DocketNo. 92-2858

StatusPublished

This text of 613 So. 2d 577 (State v. Jones) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Jones, 613 So. 2d 577, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 1518, 1993 WL 30644 (Fla. Ct. App. 1993).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

On May 13, 1992, an order dismissing an information against appellee Bobbiette Jones was entered by the trial court. On that same day, the State of Florida moved for rehearing of the order of dismissal. Rehearing was denied by order of July 28 and the state filed its notice of appeal on August 7. Appellee moves for dismissal of the appeal for lack of jurisdiction, contending that the notice of appeal was untimely.

Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.140(c)(1)(A) authorizes the state to appeal an order dismissing an information or indictment. Such an appeal must be commenced, in accordance with Rule 9.140(c)(2), by filing of the notice of appeal within 15 days of rendition of the order to •be reviewed. Further, an authorized and timely motion for rehearing will postpone rendition of the appealable order, see Fla. R.App.P. 9.020(g). There is no authorization, however, for the state’s motion for rehearing filed in the circuit court in this case. State v. Williams, 362 So.2d 699 (Fla. 2d DCA 1978); see also Griffis v. State, 593 So.2d 308 (Fla. 1st DCA 1992). We therefore conclude that the unauthorized motion for rehearing did not postpone rendition of the order and the notice of appeal was untimely. That being so, the appeal must be and hereby is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. State v. Williams.

APPEAL DISMISSED FOR LACK OF JURISDICTION.

JOANOS, C.J., and ZEHMER and BARFIELD, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

On May 13, 1992, an order dismissing an information against appellee Bobbiette Jones was entered by the trial court. On that same day, the State of Florida moved for rehearing of the order of dismissal. Rehearing was denied by order of July 28 and the state filed its notice of appeal on August 7. Appellee moves for dismissal of the appeal for lack of jurisdiction, contending that the notice of appeal was untimely.

Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.140(c)(1)(A) authorizes the state to appeal an order dismissing an information or indictment. Such an appeal must be commenced, in accordance with Rule 9.140(c)(2), by filing of the notice of appeal within 15 days of rendition of the order to •be reviewed. Further, an authorized and timely motion for rehearing will postpone rendition of the appealable order, see Fla. R.App.P. 9.020(g). There is no authorization, however, for the state’s motion for rehearing filed in the circuit court in this case. State v. Williams, 362 So.2d 699 (Fla. 2d DCA 1978); see also Griffis v. State, 593 So.2d 308 (Fla. 1st DCA 1992). We therefore conclude that the unauthorized motion for rehearing did not postpone rendition of the order and the notice of appeal was untimely. That being so, the appeal must be and hereby is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. State v. Williams.

APPEAL DISMISSED FOR LACK OF JURISDICTION.

JOANOS, C.J., and ZEHMER and BARFIELD, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

613 So. 2d 577, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 1518, 1993 WL 30644, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-jones-fladistctapp-1993.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack