State v. Jones

219 So. 2d 712, 1969 Fla. App. LEXIS 6195
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in State v. Jones. Read the opinion of the Court — 247 So. 2d 342
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided March 4, 1969·No. No. 68-885·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The defendants-appellees have moved to dismiss an appeal taken by the State of Florida pursuant to § 924.071 Fla.Stat. F.S.A. from an order suppressing a quantity of marijuana found in the possession of the defendants.

It is the appellees’ contentions that the appeal should be dismissed because § 924.-071, supra, accords the State of Florida unilateral right to prosecute a pretrial appeal from an order “quashing the search warrant or suppressing evidence obtained by search and seizure or suppressing a confession or admission made by the defendant”. Appellees argue that in conferring said right upon the State of Florida, but not upon the defendant, the state denies to the defendant due process of law, equal protection of the law and the right to a speedy trial.

We find appellees’ contentions to be without substantial merit; therefore, the motion to dismiss the appeal is denied.

Denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Jones, 219 So. 2d 712, 1969 Fla. App. LEXIS 6195 (Fla. Ct. App. 1969).

219 So. 2d 712 (State v. Jones) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.