State v. Jones

23 Fla. Supp. 2d 183
CourtCircuit Court for the Judicial Circuits of Florida
DecidedMarch 18, 1987
DocketCase No. 86-102 AC (County Court Case No. 71732, 3NC)
StatusPublished

This text of 23 Fla. Supp. 2d 183 (State v. Jones) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Circuit Court for the Judicial Circuits of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Jones, 23 Fla. Supp. 2d 183 (Fla. Super. Ct. 1987).

Opinion

OPINION OF THE COURT

PER CURIAM.

Appellant, the STATE OF FLORIDA, appeals from an Order of the lower Court granting Appellee’s Motion to Suppress the result of a blood test obtained from the Appellee. We reverse for the following:

[184]*184The learned trial Judge improperly reasoned that unless the accused is charged with some offense in addition to driving under the influence the blood test is inadmissible. We hold that F.S. § 316.1932(l)(c) is controlling and the criteria of that section has been met in the instant case.

Based on the foregoing, the Order Suppressing the Blood Test is vacated and the matter remanded to the trial Court for further proceedings.

Reversed and remanded for further proceedings.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

§ 316.1932
Florida § 316.1932(l)(c)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
23 Fla. Supp. 2d 183, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-jones-flacirct-1987.