State v. Jones

Supreme Court of Florida

State v. Jones

6 So. 2d 621, 149 Fla. 629, 1942 Fla. LEXIS 850

Supreme Court of Florida·Decided March 3, 1942·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

This cause having heretofore been submitted to the Court upon the transcript of the record of the judg *630 ment herein, and briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties, and the record having been seen and inspected, and the Court being now advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the Court that there is no error in the said judgment; it is, therefore, considered, ordered and adjudged by the Court that the said judgment of the Criminal Court of Record be, and the same is hereby affirmed.

Affirmed.

WHITFIELD, TERRELL, BUFORD, THOMAS and ADAMS, JJ., concur. BROWN, C. J., and CHAPMAN, J., dissent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

This cause having heretofore been submitted to the Court upon the transcript of the record of the judg *630 ment herein, and briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties, and the record having been seen and inspected, and the Court being now advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the Court that there is no error in the said judgment; it is, therefore, considered, ordered and adjudged by the Court that the said judgment of the Criminal Court of Record be, and the same is hereby affirmed.

Affirmed.

WHITFIELD, TERRELL, BUFORD, THOMAS and ADAMS, JJ., concur. BROWN, C. J., and CHAPMAN, J., dissent.

State v. Jones, 6 So. 2d 621, 149 Fla. 629, 1942 Fla. LEXIS 850 (Fla. 1942).

Pincite

6 So. 2d 621 (State v. Jones) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.