State v. Jones, 07ap-218 (8-30-2007)
This text of 2007 Ohio 4458 (State v. Jones, 07ap-218 (8-30-2007)) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The trial court's application of State v. Foster (2006),
109 Ohio St.3d 1 , at Appellant's resentencing hearing violated Appellant's rights as guaranteed by the Ex Post Facto and Due Process Clauses of the United States Constitution. Appellant was entitled to the imposition of minimum, concurrent prison sentences, and the failure to impose such sentences deprived Appellant of his right to a jury trial as guaranteed by the United States Constitution.
{¶ 2} We have previously rejected the precise constitutional arguments that appellant raises here. See State v. Lariva, Franklin App. No. 06AP-758,
Judgment affirmed.
*Page 1KLATT and TYACK, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
2007 Ohio 4458, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-jones-07ap-218-8-30-2007-ohioctapp-2007.