State v. . Johnston

93 N.C. 559
CourtSupreme Court of North Carolina
DecidedOctober 5, 1885
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 93 N.C. 559 (State v. . Johnston) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. . Johnston, 93 N.C. 559 (N.C. 1885).

Opinion

Meerimon, J.

The transcript of the record in this case is fatally defective. It does not appear from it that a Court was held by a Judge at the place allowed by law, or, indeed at all, or that a grand jury was drawn and charged. The papers sent up, purport to lie copies of some parts of a record, and are disorderly. They fail to give this Court .jurisdiction to decide the question intended to be sent up for review.

The case is substantially like that of State v. Butts, 91 N. C., 524, and we might, ex mero motu, order the writ of certiorari to issue, commanding the Clerk of the Superior Court to certify to this Court a full transcript- of the record. But the Attorney General moved to dismiss the appeal upon the ground that the appellant has not filed in this Court a proper transcript, and we deem it proper to grant the motion, as in looking to the case settled upon appeal for this Court, the questions intended to be .raised are without merit.

The motion to .dismiss the appeal is allowed.

Dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. . Stafford
166 S.E. 734 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1932)
State v. . Farrar
9 S.E. 449 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1889)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
93 N.C. 559, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-johnston-nc-1885.