State v. Johnston

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Johnston

530 S.W.3d 611

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided October 17, 2017·No. WD 79796·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Cassandra Johnston appeals her conviction following a jury .trial for voluntary manslaughter -and armed criminal action. She argues in three points on appeal that the Boone County trial court erred. First, Johnston argues the trial court erred in excluding testimony. Second, she argues the trial court erred in refusing to give a proffered jury instruction. Third, Johnston says insufficient evidence exists to support her conviction. Because a published opinion would have no precedential value, a memorandum has been provided to the parties. The judgment is affirmed. Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Cassandra Johnston appeals her conviction following a jury .trial for voluntary manslaughter -and armed criminal action. She argues in three points on appeal that the Boone County trial court erred. First, Johnston argues the trial court erred in excluding testimony. Second, she argues the trial court erred in refusing to give a proffered jury instruction. Third, Johnston says insufficient evidence exists to support her conviction. Because a published opinion would have no precedential value, a memorandum has been provided to the parties. The judgment is affirmed. Rule 30.25(b).

State v. Johnston, 530 S.W.3d 611 (Mo. Ct. App. 2017).

Pincite

530 S.W.3d 611 (State v. Johnston) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.