State v. Johnston

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Johnston

530 S.W.3d 611

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedOctober 17, 2017

DocketWD 79796

StatusPublished

This text of 530 S.W.3d 611 (State v. Johnston) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Johnston, 530 S.W.3d 611 (Mo. Ct. App. 2017).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Cassandra Johnston appeals her conviction following a jury .trial for voluntary manslaughter -and armed criminal action. She argues in three points on appeal that the Boone County trial court erred. First, Johnston argues the trial court erred in excluding testimony. Second, she argues the trial court erred in refusing to give a proffered jury instruction. Third, Johnston says insufficient evidence exists to support her conviction. Because a published opinion would have no precedential value, a memorandum has been provided to the parties. The judgment is affirmed. Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Cassandra Johnston appeals her conviction following a jury .trial for voluntary manslaughter -and armed criminal action. She argues in three points on appeal that the Boone County trial court erred. First, Johnston argues the trial court erred in excluding testimony. Second, she argues the trial court erred in refusing to give a proffered jury instruction. Third, Johnston says insufficient evidence exists to support her conviction. Because a published opinion would have no precedential value, a memorandum has been provided to the parties. The judgment is affirmed. Rule 30.25(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

530 S.W.3d 611, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-johnston-moctapp-2017.