State v. Johnston

188 S.W.3d 476, 2006 Mo. App. LEXIS 462, 2006 WL 920418
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided April 11, 2006·No. ED 86568·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

David Johnston (Appellant) appeals from the trial court’s judgment entered upon a jury verdict finding him guilty of manufacturing methamphetamine and felony murder. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude that there is sufficient evidence from which a reasonable juror might have found Appellant guilty beyond a reasonable doubt. State v. Brooks, 158 S.W.3d 841, 847 (Mo.App. E.D.2005). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Criminal Procedure 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Johnston, 188 S.W.3d 476, 2006 Mo. App. LEXIS 462, 2006 WL 920418 (Mo. Ct. App. 2006).

188 S.W.3d 476 (State v. Johnston) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Johnston v. State
278 S.W.3d 245 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2009)