State v. Johnson
This text of 472 P.2d 411 (State v. Johnson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Washington primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Defendant appeals from the conviction of grand larceny. His sole assignment of error challenges the credibility of the complaining witness. It is not our function to reevaluate the credibility of witnesses. The credibility and weight to be attached to the testimony of witnesses is for the trier of fact and not an appellate court. State v. Hoffman, 64 Wn.2d 445, 392 P.2d 237 (1964); State v. Bunch, 2 Wn. App. 189, 467 P.2d 212 (1970).
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
472 P.2d 411, 2 Wash. App. 743, 1970 Wash. App. LEXIS 1190, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-johnson-washctapp-1970.