State v. Johnson
32 Tex. 96
Opinion
The motion to quash the indictment in tills case was properly sustained. There is no allegation in it, of either the time or oí the place of the commission of the offense. The first is necessary, that it may appear from the charge it is not barred by the statute of limitations. The other is indispensable, that the court may know whether it has jurisdiction of the cause. For these defects it was rightfully quashed. The judgment is affirmed.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
State v. Johnson, 32 Tex. 96 (Tex. 1869).
32 Tex. 96 (State v. Johnson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Benson v. State
79 S.W.2d 122 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1935)
Kirkendall v. State
180 S.W. 676 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1915)
Mealer v. State
145 S.W. 353 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1911)