State v. Johnson

744 P.2d 600, 88 Or. App. 185, 1987 Ore. App. LEXIS 4897
Court of Appeals of Oregon·Decided October 28, 1987·No. C86-05-32370; CA A43331·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM

Defendant was convicted in a jury trial of robbery in the first degree. He did not testify at trial. He had requested Uniform Criminal Jury Instruction 10.14:

“A defendant has an absolute constitutional right not to testify. Therefore, a defendant’s decision not to testify cannot be considered as an indication of guilt. It should not be commented upon or in any way considered by you in your deliberation.”

The trial court did not give that instruction. Defendant contends, and the state concedes, that the failure to give the requested instruction is reversible error. We agree. State v. Hale, 22 Or App 144, 145, 537 P2d 1173 (1975).1

Reversed and remanded for a new trial.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Johnson, 744 P.2d 600, 88 Or. App. 185, 1987 Ore. App. LEXIS 4897 (Or. Ct. App. 1987).

744 P.2d 600 (State v. Johnson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Cunningham v. Thompson
62 P.3d 823 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 2003)