Home/Court of Appeals of Oregon/State v. Johnson

State v. Johnson

622 P.2d 336, 50 Or. App. 179, 1981 Ore. App. LEXIS 2272
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in State v. Johnson. Read the opinion of the Court — 37 Or. App. 209 →
Court of Appeals of Oregon·Decided January 26, 1981·No. No. 3846, CA 18217·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM

The state concedes that the record is inadequate to demonstrate that defendant was given proper notice of the allegations against him and that, therefore, the order should be reversed. The state suggests the case should be remanded for further proceedings, but we see no purpose to be served by doing that.

Reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Johnson, 622 P.2d 336, 50 Or. App. 179, 1981 Ore. App. LEXIS 2272 (Or. Ct. App. 1981).

622 P.2d 336 (State v. Johnson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.