State v. Johnson

554 P.2d 193, 26 Or. App. 759
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in State v. Johnson. Read the opinion of the Court — 16 Or. App. 560
Court of Appeals of Oregon·Decided September 13, 1976·No. No. C 73-05-1532, CA 5764; No. C 75-10-3368, CA 5765·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

In this case the defendant was convicted of criminal activity in drugs, specifically, the furnishing of Ritalin tablets. The issue raised on appeal is identical to that raised in State v. Johnson (Chester Leon), 26 Or App 651, 554 P2d 624 (1976). However, the posture is different. The two cases came before different trial judges of the same judicial district. In the case of Chester Johnson the trial judge found a violation of discovery statutes; in the case at bar the trial judge found to the contrary. State v. Johnson (Chester Leon), supra, is dispositive.

Reversed and remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Johnson, 554 P.2d 193, 26 Or. App. 759 (Or. Ct. App. 1976).

554 P.2d 193 (State v. Johnson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Johnson
554 P.2d 624 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 1976)