State v. Johnson

986 N.E.2d 28, 135 Ohio St. 3d 1411
Ohio Supreme Court·Decided April 24, 2013·No. 2013-0332·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Butler App. No. CA2011-11-212. On review of order certifying a conflict. The court determines that a conflict exists. The parties are to brief the issue stated in the court of appeals’ entry filed February 21, 2013:

“[W]hether, pursuant to R.C. 2951.03, newly-appointed appellate counsel is entitled to obtain a copy of the defendant’s presentence investigation report.”

O’Donnell, J., dissents.

The conflict case is State v. Jordan, 4th Dist. No. 03CA2878 (Nov. 17, 2003).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Johnson, 986 N.E.2d 28, 135 Ohio St. 3d 1411 (Ohio 2013).

986 N.E.2d 28 (State v. Johnson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. McHargue
2024 Ohio 924 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 2024)
State v. Drummond
2024 Ohio 81 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 2024)