State v. Johnson
Opinions
The appellant claims that he was denied a fair trial because he was incarcerated and without counsel for approximately three months after Ms arrest and therefore had no means of contacting his alibi witnesses before their memories of the events constituting Ms alibi had dimmed.
It would be superfluous to discuss the merits of this claim, as we did a comparable claim on the direct appeal from the judgment of conviction in State v. Childs, ante 56. TMs claim could have been raised before trial, at trial, or on appeal, and since it was not it is now barred by the doctrine of res judicata. State v. Perry, 10 Ohio St. 2d 175.
The judgment of the Court of Appeals is affirmed.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
236 N.E.2d 552 (State v. Johnson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.