State v. Johnson

Ohio Supreme Court

State v. Johnson

236 N.E.2d 552, 14 Ohio St. 2d 67, 43 Ohio Op. 2d 126, 1968 Ohio LEXIS 420

CourtOhio Supreme Court

DecidedApril 17, 1968

DocketNo. 40770

StatusPublished

Cited by6 cases

This text of 236 N.E.2d 552 (State v. Johnson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Johnson, 236 N.E.2d 552, 14 Ohio St. 2d 67, 43 Ohio Op. 2d 126, 1968 Ohio LEXIS 420 (Ohio 1968).

Pincite

Opinions

Per Curiam.

The appellant claims that he was denied a fair trial because he was incarcerated and without counsel for approximately three months after Ms arrest and therefore had no means of contacting his alibi witnesses before their memories of the events constituting Ms alibi had dimmed.

It would be superfluous to discuss the merits of this claim, as we did a comparable claim on the direct appeal from the judgment of conviction in State v. Childs, ante 56. TMs claim could have been raised before trial, at trial, or on appeal, and since it was not it is now barred by the doctrine of res judicata. State v. Perry, 10 Ohio St. 2d 175.

The judgment of the Court of Appeals is affirmed.

Judgment affirmed.

Tor, C. J., Zimmebman, Matthias, Sohneidee and Beown, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI