State v. Johnson
This text of 2014 ND 59 (State v. Johnson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering North Dakota Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Filed 4/3/14 by Clerk of Supreme Court
IN THE SUPREME COURT
STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA
2014 ND 59
State of North Dakota, Plaintiff and Appellee
v.
Tori Johnson, Defendant and Appellant
No. 20130336
Appeal from the District Court of Williams County, Northwest Judicial District, the Honorable David W. Nelson, Judge.
AFFIRMED.
Per Curiam.
Nathan K. Madden, Assistant State’s Attorney, Williams County State’s Attorney’s Office, P.O. Box 2047, Williston, N.D. 58802, for plaintiff and appellee.
Nicole E. Foster, 1999 Avenue of the Stars, Suite 1100, Century City, California 90067, for defendant and appellant.
State v. Johnson
[¶1] Tori Johnson appeals from a judgment of conviction entered after the district court denied her motion to suppress evidence and she entered a conditional guilty plea to possession of drug paraphernalia. Johnson argues the evidence found in her home when the search warrant was executed should be suppressed because the warrant was not supported by probable cause. We summarily affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(3), concluding there was probable cause to issue the warrant.
[¶2] Gerald W. VandeWalle, C.J.
Dale V. Sandstrom
Carol Ronning Kapsner
Lisa Fair McEvers
Daniel J. Crothers
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
2014 ND 59, 859 N.W.2d 929, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-johnson-nd-2014.