State v. Johnson

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in State v. Johnson. Read the opinion of the Court — 274 Mont. 124
Montana Supreme Court·Decided May 17, 1996·No. 95-310·Published

Opinion

No. 95-310 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA 1996

STATE OF MONTANA, Plaintiff and Defendant,

LYLE HENRY JOHNSON, Defendant and Appellant.

APPEAL FROM: District Court of the Fourth Judicial District, In and for the County of Missoula, The Honorable Douglas G. Harkin, Judge presiding

COUNSEL OF RECORD: For Appellant: Lyle Johnson, Pro Se, Deer Lodge, Montana For Respondent: Hon. Joseph P. Mazurek, Attorney General; John Paulson, Assistant Attorney General, Helena, Montana Betty Wing, Deputy County Attorney, Missoula, Montana

Submitted on Briefs: April 11, 1996 Decided: May 17, 1996 Filed: Chief Justice J. A. Turnage delivered the Opinion of the Court. Pursuant to Section I, Paragraph 3(c), Montana Supreme Court

1995 Internal Operating Rules, the following decision shall not be

cited as precedent and shall be published by its filing as a public

document with the Clerk of the Supreme Court and by a report of its

result to State Reporter Publishing and West Publishing Companies.

Lyle Johnson pled guilty in the Fourth Judicial District

Court, Missoula County, to a charge of indecent exposure. He was

sentenced to five years' imprisonment on the charge and a consecu-

tive term of forty-five years' imprisonment as a persistent felony offender. He was designated a dangerous offender, and the court

recommended that he be ineligible for parole or early release until

he completes the sex offender program at the prison. Appearing pro

se, Johnson appeals. We affirm.

The issues are whether Johnson was afforded effective

assistance of counsel; whether the sentence imposed is dispropor-

tionate because it includes persistent felony offender enhancement; whether the State's notice of intent to introduce evidence of prior

acts violated Johnson's rights; and whether the District Court

acted impartially during the sentencing hearing.

The several deficiencies which Johnson alleges in the

performance of his trial counsel relate to counsel's alleged

failure to warn Johnson of the possible length of his sentence or

to fully investigate the defenses of brain damage, state of mind,

and misidentification by the victims. As the State's brief

explains, the alleged deficiencies are either unsupported in the

record or are based upon JohnsonIs misunderstandings of the law and

of his attorney's role in the proceedings. Johnson has not shown

2 through reference to the record that his guilty plea resulted from any inadequacy on the part of his attorney or that his attorney's

performance was in any way deficient under the standard set forth

in Strickland v. Washington (1984), 466 U.S. 668, 104 S.Ct. 2052,

80 L.Ed.Zd 674.

Johnson's sentence is within the maximum statutory guidelines;

therefore, it does not violate the Eighth Amendment prohibition

against cruel and unusual punishment and any review of the sentence

lies with the Sentence Review Division. See State v. DeSalvo

(19951, 273 Mont. 343, 903 P.2d 202. As to his unsupported and

conclusory allegation that the prosecution's notice of intent to

introduce evidence of prior acts violated his rights, Johnson has

waived this issue because he failed to raise it in District Court.

Finally, the record does not support any claim of bias or inatten- tiveness on the part of the District Court.

We affirm the judgment of the District Court.

We concur:

3 May 17, 1996

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that the following certified order was sent ,by United States mail, prepaid, to the following named:

Lyle Johnson 700 Conley Lake Road Deer Lodge, MT 59722

Joseph P. Mazurek, Attorney General John Paulson, Assistant Attorney General Justice Building Helena, MT 59620

Betty Wing Deputy County Attorney Missoula County Courthouse Missoula, MT 59802

ED SMITH CLERK OF THE SUPREME COURT STATE OF MONTANA

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Johnson, (Mo. 1996).

State v. Johnson (State v. Johnson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Strickland v. Washington
466 U.S. 668 (Supreme Court, 1984)
State v. DeSalvo
903 P.2d 202 (Montana Supreme Court, 1995)