State v. Johnson

833 S.W.2d 479, 1992 Mo. App. LEXIS 1157, 1992 WL 159546
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in State v. Johnson. Read the opinion of the Court — 1991 Mo. App. LEXIS 896
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided July 14, 1992·No. No. 60576·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Defendant appeals from his conviction by a jury of possession of cocaine. We affirm. We find no error by the trial court and an extended opinion would have no prece-dential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only setting forth the reasons for our order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Johnson, 833 S.W.2d 479, 1992 Mo. App. LEXIS 1157, 1992 WL 159546 (Mo. Ct. App. 1992).

833 S.W.2d 479 (State v. Johnson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.