State v. Johnson

833 S.W.2d 49, 1992 Mo. App. LEXIS 1282, 1992 WL 182222
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided August 4, 1992·No. Nos. 59615, 60757·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

In this jury-tried case, defendant appeals his conviction of rape and the motion court’s denial of his Rule 29.15 motion. However, defendant’s brief does not include any points relied on or argument relating to the denial. Therefore, his appeal of the 29.15 motion is considered abandoned.

No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgments are affirmed in accord-anee with Rules 30.25(b) and 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Johnson, 833 S.W.2d 49, 1992 Mo. App. LEXIS 1282, 1992 WL 182222 (Mo. Ct. App. 1992).

833 S.W.2d 49 (State v. Johnson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Howton
890 S.W.2d 740 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1995)