State v. Johnson

813 S.W.2d 392, 1991 Mo. App. LEXIS 1298
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in State v. Johnson. Read the opinion of the Court — 1989 Mo. App. LEXIS 283
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided August 27, 1991·No. Nos. 54990, 58944·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Defendant appeals his conviction by a jury of second degree burglary, § 570.030, RSMo 1986, and felony stealing, § 570.030, RSMo 1986, for which he was sentenced as a persistent offender to a term of ten years on each charge to be served consecutively and appeals from the denial of his 29.15 motion. We affirm.

The findings and conclusions of the trial court are not clearly erroneous, and an extended opinion would have no prece-dential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only setting forth the reasons for our order affirming the judgments pursuant to Rule 30.25(b) and Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Johnson, 813 S.W.2d 392, 1991 Mo. App. LEXIS 1298 (Mo. Ct. App. 1991).

813 S.W.2d 392 (State v. Johnson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.