State v. Johnson
This text of 177 N.W. 657 (State v. Johnson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Minnesota primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
■Defendants were convicted of a felony in the distinct court of S-t. 'Louis county, -and sentenced to a term of imprisonment in the state prison. Thereafter and after the time for appeal from the judgment had expired they moved the court for a new trial on the ground of newly discovered evidence. The trial judge, though entertaining doubts of the jurisdiction of the court, made an order granting the motion and ordering a new trial, but stayed proceedings under the order and certified the cause to this court for the determination of the question whether the trial court had authority and jurisdiction to grant the motion, since the time to appeal from the judgment had expired. '
The certificate -and proceedings in this court must be dismissed. The trial court ¡having granted the motion, there is an end of the matter. The state has no right of review either by -appeal or certified case in criminal prosecutions.
The proceedings are dismissed and the -cause remanded.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
177 N.W. 657, 146 Minn. 468, 1920 Minn. LEXIS 650, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-johnson-minn-1920.