State v. Johnson

241 A.3d 954, 471 Md. 429
CourtCourt of Appeals of Maryland
DecidedNovember 20, 2020
Docket13pc/20
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 241 A.3d 954 (State v. Johnson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Maryland primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Johnson, 241 A.3d 954, 471 Md. 429 (Md. 2020).

Opinion

Circuit Court for Queen Anne’s County Case No. C-17-CR-17-000290 Argued: November 5, 2020

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

OF MARYLAND

No. 13

September Term, 2020

STATE OF MARYLAND

v.

NATHAN JOSEPH JOHNSON

Barbera, C.J. McDonald Watts Hotten Getty Booth Biran,

JJ.

PER CURIAM ORDER

Pursuant to Maryland Uniform Electronic Legal Materials Act (§§ 10-1601 et seq. of the State Government Article) this document is authentic. Filed: November 20, 2020 Suzanne Johnson 2020-11-20 12:50-05:00

Suzanne C. Johnson, Clerk STATE OF MARYLAND * IN THE

* COURT OF APPEALS

v. * OF MARYLAND

* No. 13

NATHAN JOSEPH JOHNSON * September Term, 2020

WHEREAS, the petition for writ of certiorari in the above-entitled case having been granted and argued, and

WHEREAS, following argument, the Court having issued an Order on November 10, 2020, remanding the case to the Court of Special Appeals of Maryland, without affirming or reversing, for a clarification of the basis of that Court’s April 14, 2020 decision in denying Respondent’s motion for reconsideration in Case No. CSA-REG-0109-2018, and

WHEREAS, on November 18, 2020, the Court of Special Appeals issued an Opinion clarifying the basis for its decision declining to exercise its discretion to remand this case for resentencing and, as a result, denying the State of Maryland’s motion to reconsider, and

WHEREAS, upon consideration of the Court of Special Appeals’ Opinion, it appears that the writ of certiorari was improvidently granted, it is therefore this 20th day of November, 2020, ORDERED, by the Court of Appeals of Maryland, that the writ of certiorari be, and it is hereby, dismissed with costs, the petition having been improvidently granted.

/s/ Mary Ellen Barbera Chief Judge

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Johnson v. State
Court of Special Appeals of Maryland, 2024

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
241 A.3d 954, 471 Md. 429, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-johnson-md-2020.