State v. Johnson

463 So. 2d 593
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in State v. Johnson. Read the opinion of the Court — 426 So. 2d 95
Supreme Court of Louisiana·Decided February 4, 1985·No. 84-K-2047·Published

Opinion

463 So.2d 593 (1985)

STATE of Louisiana
v.
Walter E. JOHNSON, Jr.

No. 84-K-2047.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

February 4, 1985.

Denied. Because the defendant was ultimately convicted of the extraneous offense, the error of the Court of Appeal was harmless. Nevertheless Arceneaux v. Domingue does not relate to any standard of review in a criminal case. The Court of Appeal should never affirm a ruling of the district court in criminal cases merely because it is not "clearly wrong."

DENNIS, J., would grant the writ.

LEMMON, J., votes to grant to determine (1) whether intent to commit a theft or other felony inside the residence was a true issue in the charged offense (since the defendant was standing over the bed of the 14-year old child with a knife in his hand) and (2) whether the evidence of the extraneous crime was so probative on the issue of intent as to outweigh its prejudicial effect.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Johnson, 463 So. 2d 593 (La. 1985).

463 So. 2d 593 (State v. Johnson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Gastal v. Hannan
463 So. 2d 593 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1985)