State v. Johnson

949 So. 2d 219, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 20781, 2006 WL 3615205
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided December 13, 2006·No. No. 3D06-1705·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The State appeals from an order which suppressed the appellee’s statement after he had invoked his Sixth Amendment right to counsel. Because, however, it is uncon-troverted that the appellee’s statement was spontaneous, and not “deliberately elicited” by the police, we reverse the trial court’s suppression of same. See State v. Delgadillo, 458 So.2d 20, 22 n. 2 (Fla. 3d DCA 1984), citing U.S. v. Henry, 447 U.S. 264, 100 S.Ct. 2183, 65 L.Ed.2d 115 (1980) and Massiah v. United States, 377 U.S. 201, 84 S.Ct. 1199, 12 L.Ed.2d 246 (1964).

Reversed and remanded for further proceedings.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Johnson, 949 So. 2d 219, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 20781, 2006 WL 3615205 (Fla. Ct. App. 2006).

949 So. 2d 219 (State v. Johnson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Bethel v. SECURITY NAT. INS. CO.
949 So. 2d 219 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2006)