State v. Johnson

Supreme Court of Florida

State v. Johnson

559 So. 2d 1136, 15 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 257, 1990 Fla. LEXIS 578, 1990 WL 55946

CourtSupreme Court of Florida

DecidedApril 26, 1990

DocketNo. 73913

StatusPublished

This text of 559 So. 2d 1136 (State v. Johnson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Johnson, 559 So. 2d 1136, 15 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 257, 1990 Fla. LEXIS 578, 1990 WL 55946 (Fla. 1990).

Pincite

Opinion

OVERTON, Justice.

We accepted for review Johnson v. State, 536 So.2d 270 (Fla. 3d DCA 1988), in which the Third District Court of Appeal reversed the trial court’s sentencing of Johnson “on the authority of Miles v. State, 536 So.2d 262 (Fla. 3d DCA 1988).” 536 So.2d at 270. We had previously accepted jurisdiction in Miles, and we approved the Third District’s decision in our opinion in State v. Miles, 558 So.2d 1001 (Fla.1990). The decision below is consistent with our decision in Miles, and there is no longer a basis for review in this Court. Accordingly, the petition for review is dismissed.

It is so ordered.

EHRLICH, C.J., and McDONALD, SHAW, BARKETT, GRIMES and KOGAN, JJ., concur.

NO MOTION FOR REHEARING WILL BE ENTERTAINED BY THIS COURT.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

OVERTON, Justice.

We accepted for review Johnson v. State, 536 So.2d 270 (Fla. 3d DCA 1988), in which the Third District Court of Appeal reversed the trial court’s sentencing of Johnson “on the authority of Miles v. State, 536 So.2d 262 (Fla. 3d DCA 1988).” 536 So.2d at 270. We had previously accepted jurisdiction in Miles, and we approved the Third District’s decision in our opinion in State v. Miles, 558 So.2d 1001 (Fla.1990). The decision below is consistent with our decision in Miles, and there is no longer a basis for review in this Court. Accordingly, the petition for review is dismissed.

It is so ordered.

EHRLICH, C.J., and McDONALD, SHAW, BARKETT, GRIMES and KOGAN, JJ., concur.

NO MOTION FOR REHEARING WILL BE ENTERTAINED BY THIS COURT.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

559 So. 2d 1136, 15 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 257, 1990 Fla. LEXIS 578, 1990 WL 55946, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-johnson-fla-1990.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack