State v. Johnson

269 So. 2d 8, 1972 Fla. LEXIS 3192
Supreme Court of Florida·Decided November 1, 1972·No. No. 41766·Published

Opinions

ON REHEARING GRANTED

PER CURIAM.

We tentatively accepted jurisdiction of this cause for the purpose of studying the briefs and hearing oral argument.

Having done so, we are now convinced there is no basis for conflict jurisdiction.

The writ of certiorari is discharged.

It is so ordered.

ROBERTS, C. J., and ERVIN, McCAIN and DEKLE, JJ., concur. ADKINS, J., dissents. CARLTON, J., dissents with opinion. BOYD, J., dissents and concurs with CARLTON, J.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Johnson, 269 So. 2d 8, 1972 Fla. LEXIS 3192 (Fla. 1972).

269 So. 2d 8 (State v. Johnson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Terry v. Ohio
392 U.S. 1 (Supreme Court, 1968)
Thomas v. State
250 So. 2d 15 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1971)
Hall v. State
219 So. 2d 757 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1969)
Poole v. State
247 So. 2d 443 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1971)
Johnson v. State
253 So. 2d 732 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1971)