State v. Johnsen

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Johnsen

493 S.W.3d 925, 2016 Mo. App. LEXIS 728, 2016 WL 4013589

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedJuly 26, 2016

DocketWD 78697

StatusPublished

This text of 493 S.W.3d 925 (State v. Johnsen) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Johnsen, 493 S.W.3d 925, 2016 Mo. App. LEXIS 728, 2016 WL 4013589 (Mo. Ct. App. 2016).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM

Kirk Johnsen appeals from his conviction for possession of a controlled substance. He contends that the evidence was insufficient to support his. conviction, because the State failed to prove that he possessed marijuana recovered from a vehicle in which he was a passenger. For reasons explained in Memorandum provided to the parties, we find no error and affirm the,conviction.

' AFFIRMED. Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM

Kirk Johnsen appeals from his conviction for possession of a controlled substance. He contends that the evidence was insufficient to support his. conviction, because the State failed to prove that he possessed marijuana recovered from a vehicle in which he was a passenger. For reasons explained in Memorandum provided to the parties, we find no error and affirm the,conviction.

' AFFIRMED. Rule 30.25(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

493 S.W.3d 925, 2016 Mo. App. LEXIS 728, 2016 WL 4013589, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-johnsen-moctapp-2016.