State v. Johnsen

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Johnsen

493 S.W.3d 925, 2016 Mo. App. LEXIS 728, 2016 WL 4013589

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided July 26, 2016·No. WD 78697·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM

Kirk Johnsen appeals from his conviction for possession of a controlled substance. He contends that the evidence was insufficient to support his. conviction, because the State failed to prove that he possessed marijuana recovered from a vehicle in which he was a passenger. For reasons explained in Memorandum provided to the parties, we find no error and affirm the,conviction.

' AFFIRMED. Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM

Kirk Johnsen appeals from his conviction for possession of a controlled substance. He contends that the evidence was insufficient to support his. conviction, because the State failed to prove that he possessed marijuana recovered from a vehicle in which he was a passenger. For reasons explained in Memorandum provided to the parties, we find no error and affirm the,conviction.

' AFFIRMED. Rule 30.25(b).

State v. Johnsen, 493 S.W.3d 925, 2016 Mo. App. LEXIS 728, 2016 WL 4013589 (Mo. Ct. App. 2016).

Pincite

493 S.W.3d 925 (State v. Johnsen) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.