State v. John Penciel
This text of State v. John Penciel (State v. John Penciel) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia
ATLANTA,__________________ October 08, 2013
The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:
A13A2147. THE STATE v. PENCIEL.
In the above-styled case, the State appeals from an order of the Superior Court of Chatham County granting John Penciel’s motion to quash Indictment No. CR13- 0151-J6. Penciel has filed a motion to dismiss the appeal as moot. The record shows that, on May 1, 2013, the State re-indicted Penciel for the same offense in Indictment No. CR13-0918-J6. Penciel entered a guilty plea to the indictment on September 3, 2013. Under these circumstances, the above-styled appeal is DISMISSED as MOOT, pursuant to OCGA § 5-6-48 (b) (3).1
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia 10/08/2013 Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,__________________ I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia. Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto affixed the day and year last above written.
, Clerk.
1 “An appellate court may hear and consider evidence outside the record as transmitted from the court below that an appeal has become moot. . . . Where the appellant either admits the existence of the fact of mootness as claimed by the appellee or fails to deny the existence of the same, the appeal will be dismissed.” (Footnotes omitted.) Poetter v. State, 244 Ga. App. 675, 676 (536 SE2d 576) (2000).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
State v. John Penciel, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-john-penciel-gactapp-2013.