State v. John A. Littlefield

Supreme Court of Rhode Island

State v. John A. Littlefield

3 R.I. 124

DecidedMarch 6, 1855

StatusPublished

This text of 3 R.I. 124 (State v. John A. Littlefield) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Rhode Island primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. John A. Littlefield, 3 R.I. 124 (R.I. 1855).

Pincite

Opinion

Staples, C. J.

— The alteration in the copy to which exception was taken, was made by the clerk who made the same, after comparison with the original papers before the Court. It was simply the correction of an error made by the clerk, in Ms copy. Such amendments have been frequently allowed, both in civil and criminal cases. The whole effect of them is to relieve the appellant from difficulties and doubts resulting from " the "misprision of the clerk.

The admissions of defendants in criminal matters have always been held-as evidence against them, unless obtained by some improper means. It does not appear that any such improper means were used in this case. If the admission is of a fact, it makes no difference whether made in view of this prosecution or of some other, or of none at all. The State has a right to use it in any case where it is relevant.

Exceptions overruled.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Staples, C. J.

— The alteration in the copy to which exception was taken, was made by the clerk who made the same, after comparison with the original papers before the Court. It was simply the correction of an error made by the clerk, in Ms copy. Such amendments have been frequently allowed, both in civil and criminal cases. The whole effect of them is to relieve the appellant from difficulties and doubts resulting from " the "misprision of the clerk.

The admissions of defendants in criminal matters have always been held-as evidence against them, unless obtained by some improper means. It does not appear that any such improper means were used in this case. If the admission is of a fact, it makes no difference whether made in view of this prosecution or of some other, or of none at all. The State has a right to use it in any case where it is relevant.

Exceptions overruled.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

3 R.I. 124, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-john-a-littlefield-ri-1855.