State v. J.M. Smith

Supreme Court of Louisiana

State v. J.M. Smith

126 So. 518, 169 La. 1034, 1930 La. LEXIS 1634

Supreme Court of Louisiana·Decided February 3, 1930·No. No. 30410.·Published

Opinion

ROGERS, J.

The issue presented in this proceeding is similar to the one presented in City of Shreveport v. Rambo, 125 So. 625,1 recently decided. On the authority of that decision, relator is entitled to the relief prayed for.

*1035 For the reasons assigned, the respondent judge is ordered to allow relator to file his motion to quash, and, in due course, to hear and dispose of the issue raised on the motion.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ROGERS, J.

The issue presented in this proceeding is similar to the one presented in City of Shreveport v. Rambo, 125 So. 625,1 recently decided. On the authority of that decision, relator is entitled to the relief prayed for.

*1035 For the reasons assigned, the respondent judge is ordered to allow relator to file his motion to quash, and, in due course, to hear and dispose of the issue raised on the motion.

State v. J.M. Smith, 126 So. 518, 169 La. 1034, 1930 La. LEXIS 1634 (La. 1930).

Pincite

126 So. 518 (State v. J.M. Smith) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related