State v. Jimmy Mathis

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee
DecidedJune 26, 1997
Docket02C01-9605-CC-00177
StatusPublished

This text of State v. Jimmy Mathis (State v. Jimmy Mathis) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Jimmy Mathis, (Tenn. Ct. App. 1997).

Opinion

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE

AT JACKSON

MAY 1997 SESSION FILED June 26, 1997

Cecil Crowson, Jr. Appellate C ourt Clerk JIMMY L. MATHIS, ) ) C.C.A. NO. 02C01-9605-CC-00177 Appellant, ) ) HARDIN COUNTY VS. ) ) HON. C. CREED MCGINLEY, STATE OF TENNESSEE, ) JUDGE ) Appellant. ) (Post-conviction)

FOR THE APPELLANT: FOR THE APPELLEE:

GUY WILKINSON JOHN KNOX WALKUP Public Defender Attorney General & Reporter

RICHARD W. DeBERRY ELLEN H. POLLACK Asst. Public Defender Asst. Attorney General P.O. Box 663 450 James Robertson Pkwy. Camden, TN 38320 Nashville, TN 37243-0493

ROBERT (GUS) RADFORD District Attorney General

JOHN OVERTON Asst. District Attorney General Hardin County Courthouse Savannah, TN 38372

OPINION FILED:____________________

AFFIRMED -- RULE 20

JOHN H. PEAY, Judge ORDER

The petitioner pled guilty to one count of aggravated sexual battery and was

sentenced to eight years in the Department of Correction. He subsequently filed a

petition for post-conviction relief alleging ineffective assistance of counsel and that his

guilty plea was neither knowing nor voluntary. After a hearing, the court below denied

relief, finding “nothing in the record that would imply that the petitioner was denied any

right guaranteed by the constitutions of the United States or the State of Tennessee.”

Upon our review of the record, we find that the evidence does not preponderate against

the lower court’s finding. Accordingly, the judgment below is affirmed in accordance with

Rule 20 of the Court of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee.

______________________________ JOHN H. PEAY, Judge

CONCUR:

______________________________ GARY R. WADE, Judge

______________________________ THOMAS T. W OODALL, Judge

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
State v. Jimmy Mathis, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-jimmy-mathis-tenncrimapp-1997.