State v. Jiminez
571 A.2d 295, 118 N.J. 252, 1990 N.J. LEXIS 27
This text of 571 A.2d 295 (State v. Jiminez) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
State v. Jiminez, 571 A.2d 295, 118 N.J. 252, 1990 N.J. LEXIS 27 (N.J. 1990).
Opinion
The judgment 229 N.J.Super. 256, 551 A.2d 191 is reversed, substantially for the reasons expressed in the opinion of the Appellate Division in State v. Joseph Clay, reported at 230 N.J.Super. 509, 553 A.2d 1356 (1989).
For reversal — Chief Justice WILENTZ and Justices CLIFFORD, HANDLER, POLLOCK, O’HERN, GARIBALDI and STEIN — 7.
For affirmance — None.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
State v. Mastapeter
674 A.2d 1016 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1996)
State v. Kyc
608 A.2d 1013 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1992)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
571 A.2d 295, 118 N.J. 252, 1990 N.J. LEXIS 27, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-jiminez-nj-1990.