State v. Jiminez
571 A.2d 295, 118 N.J. 252, 1990 N.J. LEXIS 27
Opinion
The judgment 229 N.J.Super. 256, 551 A.2d 191 is reversed, substantially for the reasons expressed in the opinion of the Appellate Division in State v. Joseph Clay, reported at 230 N.J.Super. 509, 553 A.2d 1356 (1989).
For reversal — Chief Justice WILENTZ and Justices CLIFFORD, HANDLER, POLLOCK, O’HERN, GARIBALDI and STEIN — 7.
For affirmance — None.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
State v. Jiminez, 571 A.2d 295, 118 N.J. 252, 1990 N.J. LEXIS 27 (N.J. 1990).
571 A.2d 295 (State v. Jiminez) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
State v. Mastapeter
674 A.2d 1016 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1996)
State v. Kyc
608 A.2d 1013 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1992)