State v. Jennings

18 S.E. 932, 40 S.C. 553
Supreme Court of South Carolina·Decided January 15, 1894·No. No. 3275·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

This was a motion which was refused by the following order of

Pee Oubiam.

The defendant in this case having been convicted of murder, and having perfected his appeal from the judgment of the Circuit Court, now moves to suspend the appeal for the purpose of enabling him to move for a new trial in the Circuit Court upon the ground of after-discovered evidence. Under the well settled practice of this court, it is necessary that the appellant should make such a prima facie showing as would satisfy this court that this was a proper case for the granting of the motion submitted by the appellant. After a careful consideration of the affidavits upon which the motion is made, we cannot say that such a showing has been made. It is, therefore, ordered, that the motion be refused.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Jennings, 18 S.E. 932, 40 S.C. 553 (S.C. 1894).

18 S.E. 932 (State v. Jennings) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Ford
392 S.E.2d 781 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1990)
State v. Butler
200 S.E.2d 70 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1973)