State v. . Jenkins
34 N.C. 121
Opinion
The mother and her child had acquired a settlement in the county of Montgomery at the time this proceeding was commenced. The county of Richmond was not chargeable, and therefore had no right to require an indemnity. There is error. The point is settled by S. v. Roberts,
PER CURIAM. Reversed.
Cited: S. v. Elam,
(123)
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
State v. . Jenkins, 34 N.C. 121 (N.C. 1851).
34 N.C. 121 (State v. . Jenkins) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
State v. . Elam
61 N.C. 460 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1868)
State v. . Roberts
32 N.C. 350 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1849)