State v. . Jenkins
34 N.C. 121
This text of 34 N.C. 121 (State v. . Jenkins) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
State v. . Jenkins, 34 N.C. 121 (N.C. 1851).
Opinion
The mother and her child had acquired a settlement in the county of Montgomery at the time this proceeding was commenced. The county of Richmond was not chargeable, and therefore had no right to require an indemnity. There is error. The point is settled by S. v. Roberts,
PER CURIAM. Reversed.
Cited: S. v. Elam,
(123)
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
State v. . Elam
61 N.C. 460 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1868)
State v. . Roberts
32 N.C. 350 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1849)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
34 N.C. 121, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-jenkins-nc-1851.