State v. Jenkins

522 So. 2d 890, 1988 WL 11351
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedFebruary 17, 1988
Docket87-1890
StatusPublished
Cited by7 cases

This text of 522 So. 2d 890 (State v. Jenkins) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Jenkins, 522 So. 2d 890, 1988 WL 11351 (Fla. Ct. App. 1988).

Opinion

522 So.2d 890 (1988)

STATE of Florida, Appellant,
v.
George M. JENKINS, Appellee.

No. 87-1890.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

February 17, 1988.
Rehearing Denied April 11, 1988.

Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Alan L. Overton, Asst. Atty. Gen., Tampa, for appellant.

Gaston J. Fernandez, Tampa, for appellee.

LEHAN, Acting Chief Judge.

The state appeals the trial court's dismissal of the criminal charge against the defendant. We reverse.

Defendant was charged with attempted sexual battery. He filed a motion to dismiss the amended information. In response the state filed a traverse. The trial court granted defendant's motion upon a finding that the facts shown did not support the charge of attempted sexual battery.

Without reciting the bizarre facts in any detail, suffice it to say that the facts as alleged in defendant's motion and the state's traverse, while not absolutely indicative of an attempted sexual battery, are sufficient to allow a jury to find defendant guilty of that crime. The defendant's intent, being a state of mind, must be inferred by the trier of fact from the defendant's acts and the surrounding circumstances and is ordinarily not to be determined on a motion to dismiss. See State v. Stenza, 453 So.2d 169, 172 (Fla. 2d DCA 1984). Similarly, whether defendant's conduct constituted a threat to cause serious personal injury and whether the victim had a reasonable belief that defendant had the ability to carry out that threat are for the jury to decide.

Reversed.

THREADGILL and PARKER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

DAVID PUY v. STATE OF FLORIDA
District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2020
E.I. v. State
25 So. 3d 625 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2009)
J.G. v. State
915 So. 2d 274 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2005)
V.M. v. State
729 So. 2d 428 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1999)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
522 So. 2d 890, 1988 WL 11351, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-jenkins-fladistctapp-1988.