State v. Jenabzadeh
This text of 823 P.2d 1040 (State v. Jenabzadeh) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Oregon primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Defendant was convicted of delivery of a controlled substance as part of a drug cultivation, manufacture or delivery scheme or network. ORS 475.992. He had demurred on the ground that the scheme or network language is unconstitutionally vague. The trial court erroneously overruled his demurrer. State v. Moeller, 105 Or App 434, 806 P2d 130, rev dismissed 312 Or 76, 815 P2d 701 (1991).
Because we dispose of the case on that issue, we need not reach defendant’s other assignment of error.
Reversed and remanded with instructions to dismiss the indictment.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
823 P.2d 1040, 111 Or. App. 392, 1992 Ore. App. LEXIS 381, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-jenabzadeh-orctapp-1992.