State v. Jeffrey Schmidt

Court of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee·Decided December 17, 1997·No. 01C01-9701-CC-00027·Published

Opinion

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE

AT NASHVILLE FILED NOVEMBER 1997 SESSION

December 17, 1997

Cecil W. Crowson

Appellate Court Clerk

STATE OF TENNESSEE, )

) C.C.A. NO. 01C01-9701-CC-00027 Appellee, )

) MONTGOMERY COUNTY

VS. )

) HON. JOHN H. GASAWAY, III, JEFFERY SCOTT SCHMIDT, ) JUDGE )

Appellant. ) (Revocation of Community Corrections)

FOR THE APPELLANT: FOR THE APPELLEE:

MICHAEL JONES JOHN KNOX WALKUP Public Defender Attorney General & Reporter

COLLIER W. GOODLETT DARYL J. BRAND Asst. Public Defender Asst. Attorney General 109 South 2nd St. 450 James Robertson Pkwy. Clarksville, TN 37040 Nashville, TN 37243-0493

JOHN W. CARNEY

District Attorney General

STEVE GARRETT

Asst. District Attorney General 204 Franklin St.

Clarksville, TN 37041

OPINION FILED:____________________

AFFIRMED - RULE 20 ORDER

JOHN H. PEAY, Judge

OPINION

The defendant was convicted, on a guilty plea, in March 1993 on a charge of theft. A four year sentence was imposed with all but ninety days being suspended. The defendant’s probation was revoked on two previous occasions for violations. He was placed back on probation at the first revocation and placed in Community Corrections after the second revocation.

On July 6, 1995, a warrant was issued for the defendant to revoke his Community Corrections sentence relying on arrests and convictions in the General Sessions Court and on his failure to abide by his curfew requirements. The trial court, finding that the factual allegations were true and that alternative sentencing had not been successful, revoked the defendant’s Community Corrections sentence and ordered him to serve the balance of his sentence with the Department of Correction.

We have reviewed the record in this case and conclude that this is an appropriate case for affirmance under Rule 20 of the Court of Criminal Appeals.

It appearing that the appellant is indigent, costs of the appeal will be paid by the State, for which let execution issue. This matter is remanded to the trial court for collection of costs accrued below.

JOHN H. PEAY, Judge

CONCUR:

JOSEPH M. TIPTON, Judge

DAVID H. WELLES, Judge

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Jeffrey Schmidt, (Tenn. Ct. App. 1997).

State v. Jeffrey Schmidt (State v. Jeffrey Schmidt) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.