State v. Jeffery

479 P.3d 629, 308 Or. App. 833
Court of Appeals of Oregon·Decided January 27, 2021·No. A171571·Published

Opinion

Submitted December 22, 2020; conviction on Count 1 reversed and remanded, remanded for resentencing, otherwise affirmed January 27, 2021

STATE OF OREGON, Plaintiff-Respondent,

v.

ANTONIO D’EPIRO JEFFERY,

Defendant-Appellant.

Washington County Circuit Court 18CR82121; A171571

479 P3d 629

D. Charles Bailey, Jr., Judge. Ernest G. Lannet, Chief Defender, Criminal Appellate Section, and Sarah Laidlaw, Deputy Public Defender, Office of Public Defense Services, filed the brief for appellant.

Ellen F. Rosenblum, Attorney General, Benjamin Gutman, Solicitor General, and Jonathan N. Schildt, Assistant Attorney General, filed the brief for respondent.

Before Ortega, Presiding Judge, and Shorr, Judge, and Powers, Judge.

PER CURIAM Conviction on Count 1 reversed and remanded; remanded for resentencing; otherwise affirmed.

834 State v. Jeffery

PER CURIAM Defendant was convicted by jury verdict of delivery of methamphetamine (Count 1), unlawful possession of methamphetamine (Count 2), and unlawful possession of a firearm (Count 4). The jury had been instructed that its verdicts did not need to be unanimous, which was error under the Sixth Amendment to the United States Constitution. See Ramos v. Louisiana, 590 US ___, 140 S Ct 1390, 206 L Ed 2d 583 (2020). The jury was unanimous as to Counts 2 and 4, but not as to Count 1.

On appeal, defendant argues that the trial court erred in giving the nonunanimous jury instruction, that the error was structural, and that all of his convictions therefore should be reversed. The state concedes that defendant is entitled to reversal on the nonunanimous count. We agree and accept the concession and exercise our discretion to correct the error for the reasons set forth in State v. Ulery, 366 Or 500, 464 P3d 1123 (2020). As for defendant’s structural error argument concerning the remaining convictions, he makes the same arguments that were rejected in State v. Flores Ramos, 367 Or 292, 478 P3d 515 (2020).

Conviction on Count 1 reversed and remanded;

remanded for resentencing; otherwise affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Jeffery, 479 P.3d 629, 308 Or. App. 833 (Or. Ct. App. 2021).

479 P.3d 629 (State v. Jeffery) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Ramos v. Louisiana
140 S. Ct. 1390 (Supreme Court, 2020)
State v. Ulery
464 P.3d 1123 (Oregon Supreme Court, 2020)
State v. Flores Ramos
478 P.3d 515 (Oregon Supreme Court, 2020)