State v. Jefferson

51 So. 203, 125 La. 296, 1910 La. LEXIS 476
CourtSupreme Court of Louisiana
DecidedJanuary 17, 1910
DocketNo. 17,987
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 51 So. 203 (State v. Jefferson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Jefferson, 51 So. 203, 125 La. 296, 1910 La. LEXIS 476 (La. 1910).

Opinion

PROVOSTY, J.

The defendant was convicted of rape, without capital punishment, and was sentenced to the penitentiary for life.

His complaint is that, although the prosecution was for a capital offense, the jury were allowed to separate. Separation of the jury must be availed of before verdict, unless knowledge of it came to the defendant or his counsel only after verdict. In the instant case the irregularity was urged 'for the first time after verdict by motion for a new trial; and defendant has not shown that the knowledge of it came to him or to his counsel only after verdict. The burden was on him to do so. State v. Gianfala, 113 La. 479, 37 South. 30.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Berry v. Bass
102 So. 76 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1924)
State v. Mitchell
53 So. 561 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1910)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
51 So. 203, 125 La. 296, 1910 La. LEXIS 476, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-jefferson-la-1910.