State v. Javier Bonifacio Barrera Alaniz

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedMay 3, 2016
Docket13-15-00554-CR
StatusPublished

This text of State v. Javier Bonifacio Barrera Alaniz (State v. Javier Bonifacio Barrera Alaniz) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Javier Bonifacio Barrera Alaniz, (Tex. Ct. App. 2016).

Opinion

NUMBER 13-15-00554-CR

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellant,

v.

JAVIER BONIFACIO BARRERA ALANIZ, Appellee.

On appeal from the County Court at Law No. 8 of Hidalgo County, Texas.

ORDER ABATING APPEAL

Before Chief Justice Valdez and Justices Rodriguez and Garza Order Per Curiam

Appellee’s counsel, Johnathan Ball, has filed a motion requesting to withdraw as

counsel. According to his motion to withdraw, good cause exists for him to withdraw

because he is now employed by the Hidalgo County District Attorney’s Office as the

Border Crimes Unit prosecutor. Adequate reason for the discharge of counsel and appointment of new counsel

rests within the sound discretion of the trial court. Carroll v. State, 176 S.W.3d 249, 255

(Tex. App.--Houston [1st Dist.] 2004, pet. ref'd). In those circumstances where the

appointment of substitute counsel may be necessary, an appellate court, when faced with

a motion to withdraw, should abate the proceeding to the trial court for determination of

this issue. Accordingly, we ABATE the appeal and REMAND the cause to the trial court

for further proceedings consistent with this order.

Upon remand, the trial court shall determine whether appellee’s court-appointed

attorney should remain as appellee's counsel; and, if not, whether appellee is entitled to

new appointed counsel. If the trial court determines that there is no reason to discharge

appellee’s current appointed attorney and appoint substitute counsel, the court shall enter

an order to that effect. If the trial court determines that new counsel should be appointed,

the name, address, telephone number, email address, and state bar number of the newly

appointed counsel shall be included in the order appointing counsel. The trial court shall

further cause its order to be included in a supplemental clerk's record to be filed with the

Clerk of this Court on or before the expiration of ten days from the date of this order.

It is so ordered.

PER CURIAM

Do not publish. TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2(b).

Delivered and filed the 3rd day of May, 2016.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Carroll v. State
176 S.W.3d 249 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 2005)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
State v. Javier Bonifacio Barrera Alaniz, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-javier-bonifacio-barrera-alaniz-texapp-2016.