State v. Javier Bonifacio Barrera Alaniz
This text of State v. Javier Bonifacio Barrera Alaniz (State v. Javier Bonifacio Barrera Alaniz) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
NUMBER 13-15-00554-CR
COURT OF APPEALS
THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS
CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG
THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellant,
v.
JAVIER BONIFACIO BARRERA ALANIZ, Appellee.
On appeal from the County Court at Law No. 8 of Hidalgo County, Texas.
ORDER ABATING APPEAL
Before Chief Justice Valdez and Justices Rodriguez and Garza Order Per Curiam
Appellee’s counsel, Johnathan Ball, has filed a motion requesting to withdraw as
counsel. According to his motion to withdraw, good cause exists for him to withdraw
because he is now employed by the Hidalgo County District Attorney’s Office as the
Border Crimes Unit prosecutor. Adequate reason for the discharge of counsel and appointment of new counsel
rests within the sound discretion of the trial court. Carroll v. State, 176 S.W.3d 249, 255
(Tex. App.--Houston [1st Dist.] 2004, pet. ref'd). In those circumstances where the
appointment of substitute counsel may be necessary, an appellate court, when faced with
a motion to withdraw, should abate the proceeding to the trial court for determination of
this issue. Accordingly, we ABATE the appeal and REMAND the cause to the trial court
for further proceedings consistent with this order.
Upon remand, the trial court shall determine whether appellee’s court-appointed
attorney should remain as appellee's counsel; and, if not, whether appellee is entitled to
new appointed counsel. If the trial court determines that there is no reason to discharge
appellee’s current appointed attorney and appoint substitute counsel, the court shall enter
an order to that effect. If the trial court determines that new counsel should be appointed,
the name, address, telephone number, email address, and state bar number of the newly
appointed counsel shall be included in the order appointing counsel. The trial court shall
further cause its order to be included in a supplemental clerk's record to be filed with the
Clerk of this Court on or before the expiration of ten days from the date of this order.
It is so ordered.
PER CURIAM
Do not publish. TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2(b).
Delivered and filed the 3rd day of May, 2016.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
State v. Javier Bonifacio Barrera Alaniz, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-javier-bonifacio-barrera-alaniz-texapp-2016.